From Medically Ready to Discharged: Strategies to Close the Gap
The Journal of Hospital Medicine just published a new multicenter Veterans Health Administration (VHA) study on patients who are “medically ready for discharge”: the acute need for hospitalization has resolved, but the patient is still in the bed. Across 21 VHA hospitals, 41.9% of acute-care general medicine patients were medically ready for discharge, and 18.1% had a “major discharge barrier,” meaning they had been medically ready for a week or longer. For more than half of those patients, the intended destination was a long-term care facility. The most common unmet needs were assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) and geriatric-psychiatric care. The dominant resources awaited were payor source and selection of discharge location, not further medical treatment.
It builds on earlier multisite research that calls for widespread attention to this issue. In a point-in-time assessment across 15 academic U.S. hospitals:
35.0% of hospitalized medicine patients were medically ready for discharge
9.8% had a major barrier, having waited a week or longer; 44.4% of those had been ready for a month or more
84.1% of patients with major barriers required some form of skilled therapy or daily living support — needs that are “often outside of clinician control”
That last point matters. Avoidable days are usually attributed to hospitalists, but the bottleneck often sits downstream, in post-acute access, placement, and coordination. A retrospective study of neurology inpatients found that 39% of all patient-days occurred after medical readiness for discharge, with delayed discharges clustering around weekends and associated with hospital-acquired complications. The problem is not unique to the U.S.: an Italian study found “difficult discharge” patients prolonged their acute stay by nearly a week on average, driven by systemic and organizational causes rather than clinical ones, and roughly 20% of Canadian acute-care patients “get stuck” after treatment is complete.
The cost is real. Every one of those beds is unavailable for the next patient. That means ED boarding, OR holds, diversions, and lost revenue, plus higher risk of hospital-acquired complications for the patient who is waiting — a risk documented directly in the neurology cohort, where patients with hospital-acquired complications accumulated more than twice as many unnecessary days.
Lever 1: Pull internal throughput barriers into patient-level problem-solving
Internal operations frequently set the pace of a stay.
Lab result turnaround and review. A retrospective cohort study established for the first time that delay in reviewing laboratory results is significantly associated with prolonged length of stay (LOS); patients often remain hospitalized awaiting a review before a discharge decision can be made. Notably, any gains from faster turnaround are “greatly diminished” unless results are actually reviewed in a timely manner. In reality, if a physician or APP has rounded on potential discharges early in the morning yet not all labs are back, there may be a delay in them re-reviewing the labs when they have resulted because they have moved on to their next patients to be seen.
Prioritized imaging and reads. In a cohort of 73,107 general medical hospitalizations across five hospitals, the biggest drivers of imaging delay were system factors — hospital site (up to 22 hours), unit location (up to 10 hours), and weekend ordering (up to 21 hours) — while physician characteristics were minimally associated with delay. Each additional hour waiting for MRI was associated with a 1.2-hour increase in LOS.
The operational implication: engage hospital operations (lab, radiology, transport, EHR default workflows) in daily, patient-level problem-solving so that diagnostics and their reads are expedited, weekends are staffed, and no bed-day is lost to a result that was not produced or not acted upon.
Lever 2: Lock in post-acute care coordination
Most avoidable days accrue downstream, so coordination to subacute (SNF) and inpatient rehab must be engineered, not improvised. Hospital-to-post-acute transitions are prone to errors from inaccurate and untimely discharge communication. Poor discharge planning predictably causes communication delays between hospital and community teams, and discharge planning that starts at admission with a designated coordinator is a consistent facilitator.
Three delay sources dominate and should each have an owner and a clock:
Communication: standardized communication for complete discharge summaries (medication reconciliation, wound care, follow-up, functional status) before transfer.
Authorization: payor source and placement selection were the leading resources awaited in the VA study. Administrative burdens — prior authorization, slow appeals, and narrow networks — are increasingly implicated; in 2023 roughly 15% of Massachusetts hospital bed-days were occupied by patients awaiting post-acute placement, and three large Medicare Advantage insurers had initial post-acute denial rates of 22.7%–25.9% in 2022.
Transportation and placement: reduced SNF bed supply after the pandemic (an estimated 46% of facilities limiting admissions) compounds every other delay.
Post-acute collaboratives built on shared metrics, defined roles, and aligned incentives are the structural answer. Hospitals that study their own cost, use, and outcomes across the continuum and narrow referrals to higher-performing, lower-cost partners can realize substantial savings; managed-care plans achieve 30%–40% lower post-acute use and 20%–50% lower readmission rates partly through active engagement with post-acute providers.
Lever 3: Mobilize patients to avoid post-acute rehab altogether
Because skilled therapy and ADL support drive most major barriers, preserving function during the stay can change the destination itself.
Nurse-managed mobility scoring and “get up and go.” The American Geriatrics Society white paper found that assessing mobility within 24 hours of admission, educating patients, and ambulating them daily made patients more likely to be discharged home than to a SNF, with shorter stays. Early mobilization improves muscle strength, LOS, and functional outcomes with few adverse effects.
Deploying mobility techs. A randomized clinical trial in general medical patients showed that a walking intervention with a behavioral/goal-setting component — deliverable by a mobility aide rather than a physical therapist — improved post-hospitalization function and community mobility, with fewer falls than usual care.
Scalable, system-level impact. The MOVE ON initiative across 14 Ontario hospitals increased the proportion of older patients out of bed daily and was associated with significantly shorter median LOS during and after implementation.
In short, nurse-driven mobility scores plus dedicated mobility techs are a high-leverage, low-cost intervention that can keep patients functionally independent enough to go home, therefore bypassing subacute rehab and the authorization and transport delays that come with them.
Under CMS’s mandatory Transforming Episode Accountability Model (TEAM), hospitals are financially accountable for the 30 days after surgery, including post-acute care. This extends a long policy trajectory toward holding hospitals accountable for spending and outcomes across the continuum — the same logic behind Medicare Spending per Beneficiary, bundled payments, and transitional care management. Post-acute care is also the single largest remaining lever for cost reduction, since inpatient LOS compression has largely reached its limit.
At Vantage Clinical Partners, we help health systems close this gap:
Hospital medicine optimization: discharge planning that starts at admission, aligned care coordination, clear escalation paths, and engagement of lab, imaging, and transport in patient-level problem-solving.
Post-acute collaboratives: structured SNF and home health partnerships built on shared metrics, defined roles, and aligned incentives.
Mobility-first programs: nurse-managed get-up-and-go scoring and deployment of mobility techs to preserve function and avoid post-acute placement.
Throughput diagnostics: identifying where medically ready patients get stuck and why.
Throughput depends on the whole care continuum — aligned internal operations, enhanced mobility, and locked-in coordination.
Beth Papetti, MBA FHM
Principal & Chief Operating Officer
References
Agerholm, J., Jensen, N. K., & Liljas, A. (2023). Healthcare professionals’ perception of barriers and facilitators for care coordination of older adults with complex care needs being discharged from hospital: A qualitative comparative study of two Nordic capitals. BMC Geriatrics, 23(1).
Bann, M., Meo, N., Lopez, J. P., Hallory, K., Schaefer, J., O’Leary, K. J., & Burke, R. E. (2023). Medically ready for discharge: A multisite “point-in-time” assessment of hospitalized patients. Journal of Hospital Medicine, 18(9), 773–781.
Bartsch, E., Shin, S., Roberts, S., Chu, C., Weinerman, A., Verma, A. A., & Razak, F. (2022). Imaging delays among medical inpatients in Toronto, Ontario: A cohort study. PLoS One, 17(7), Article e0271601.
Brown, C. J., Foley, K. T., Lowman, J. D., MacLennan, P. A., Razjouyan, J., Najafi, B., Locher, J., & Allman, R. M. (2016). Comparison of posthospitalization function and community mobility in hospital mobility program and usual care patients: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Internal Medicine, 176(7), 921–927.
Callahan, K. E., Boustani, M., Ferrante, L., Forman, D. E., Gurwitz, J., High, K. P., & AGS Research Committee. (2021). Embedding and sustaining a focus on function in specialty research and care. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 69(1), 227–233.
Chen, C., & Ackerly, D. C. (2014). Beyond ACOs and bundled payments: Medicare’s shift toward accountability in fee-for-service. JAMA, 311(7), 673–674.
Deardorff, W. J., Burke, R. E., & Makam, A. N. (2026). Navigating postacute care options for patients after hospital discharge: A review. JAMA Internal Medicine, 186(3).
Guidry, M. M., Tuck, M., Akwe, J., et al. (2026). Medically ready for discharge: A multicenter Veterans Health Administration assessment of hospitalized patients. Journal of Hospital Medicine. Advance online publication.
Joo, J. H., Hughes, M. L., Hu, W., et al. (2025). Overlap between transitional care management after hospital discharge and alternative payment models. Journal of Hospital Medicine. Advance online publication.
Kuluski, K., Jacobson, D., Ghazalbash, S., et al. (2024). Setting the balance of care for older adults at risk of hospitalization and delayed discharge: A mixed-methods research protocol. PLoS One, 19(11), Article e0314176.
Liu, B., Moore, J. E., Almaawiy, U., Chan, W. H., Khan, S., Ewusie, J., Hamid, J. S., & Straus, S. E. (2018). Outcomes of Mobilisation of Vulnerable Elders in Ontario (MOVE ON): A multisite interrupted time series evaluation of an implementation intervention to increase patient mobilisation. Age and Ageing, 47(1), 112–119.
McGarry, B. E., Wilcock, A. D., Gandhi, A. D., Grabowski, D. C., & Barnett, M. L. (2025). Extended hospital stays in Medicare Advantage and traditional Medicare. JAMA Internal Medicine, 185(11).
Mor, V., Rahman, M., & McHugh, J. (2016). Accountability of hospitals for Medicare beneficiaries’ postacute care discharge disposition. JAMA Internal Medicine, 176(1), 119–121.
Ong, M. S., Magrabi, F., & Coiera, E. (2018). Delay in reviewing test results prolongs hospital length of stay: A retrospective cohort study. BMC Health Services Research, 18, Article 369.
Roberts, D. E., Holloway, R. G., & George, B. P. (2018). Post-acute care discharge delays for neurology inpatients: Opportunity to improve patient flow. Neurology: Clinical Practice, 8(4), 302–310.
Vinci, A., Furia, G., Cammalleri, V., et al. (2023). Burden of delayed discharge on acute hospital medical wards: A retrospective ecological study in Rome, Italy. PLoS One, 18(7), Article e0288079.
Wald, H. L., Ramaswamy, R., Perskin, M. H., Roberts, L., Bogaisky, M., Suen, W., & Mikhailovich, A. (2019). The case for mobility assessment in hospitalized older adults: American Geriatrics Society white paper executive summary. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 67(1), 11–16.